Home
About Us
Calendar
Fiero Documents
Merchandise
Tips
Links
Members
Message Board
Other Fiero Clubs
VIN Decoder
Speed Calculator
GFC Facebook Page
 

Author Topic: Control arms for the front, but the rear?  (Read 15909 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Raydar

  • Paid Members
  • *****
  • Posts: 2,965
    • View Profile
Re: Control arms for the front, but the rear?
« Reply #15 on: April 14, 2017, 08:44:15 am »
Naah. Mine are all poly. Just when I did the new car, I left the rubber ones in the trailing links. Don't really notice much, if any, difference between the two.
Hitting a pothole is more "sudden" and imparts more front-to-rear shock to the chassis than acceleration forces - even strong ones. Since the trailing link only locates the wheel front-to-rear, the alignment will hardly be affected at all. 
...

GTRS Fiero

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12,510
  • It is what it is.
    • View Profile
Re: Control arms for the front, but the rear?
« Reply #16 on: April 14, 2017, 05:52:32 pm »
I guess I'll have a rough ride.

GTRS Fiero

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12,510
  • It is what it is.
    • View Profile
Re: Control arms for the front, but the rear?
« Reply #17 on: April 24, 2017, 06:29:04 pm »
Going along with this, the '88 has no rear ball joints, correct?

Fierofool

  • Global Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 10,576
    • View Profile
    • Georgia Fiero Club
Re: Control arms for the front, but the rear?
« Reply #18 on: April 24, 2017, 07:02:13 pm »
You are correct.  The P22 Parts Book, Chassis Group 7.000, Page 221 illustration and following parts descriptions show no ball joints for the rear of the 88.  Subsequent inspection of my 88 verifies that the ball joints are missing on it. 

There are three kinds of men:

1.    The ones that learn by reading.
2.    The few who learn by observation.
3.    The rest of them have to pee on the electric fence and find out for themselves.    Will Rogers